Life In A Backwater Blog
That's backwater. Not backwash.
But anyways...
The other morning -- the morning after the Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner, in fact -- I posted a little goof about the Colbert thing. Later in the day, I noticed the Colbert thing was all over the internets. Not that there is any cause-and-effect connection, I hasten to make clear. This is a backwater blog; it has never led any sort of internet conversation, ever.
But I must tell you that as soon as I realized The Colbert Thing had become a cause celebre on the left, I lusted for some Big Shot Blog, a "frontwater" blog, so to speak, to link to my little Colbert goof. I resisted the urge to whore the thing around. Regular readers will recall that I made a vow some number of posts ago that from where the sun then stood, I would blogwhore no more, forever. That decision (to not blogwhore, I mean) was essentially an instinctual one. I knew I didn't like doing it. I didn't really know why I didn't like it, but I knew that I didn't, and so I quit doing it. This morning, it occurs to me why I'm glad I did.
My pal Avedon links to a post on The Colbert Thing at Firedoglake. As of this moment (hitting the "Reload" button...), there are 256 responses to that post. Just skimming those responses, they seem to gather themselves into a relatively small number of ideas. Well, you know, what else is new? That's kind of the nature of the beast. There are a bunch of us out there, and on any given subject many of us think basically along the same lines.
Except as ego-boo, who would want that many responses? I don't mean that as a slam against anyone; I mean it as an expression of my feeling on the subject, and nothing more. I like my little band of loyal Corpusculites. I like getting to know them. They say interesting things. They sometimes make me laugh. Sometimes they make me rethink something I said in one of my posts. A few of them even offer me special discount prices on Cialis, or free downloads of thousands of .mp3s.
I confess that when I first started this blog back in November of 2004, I had sugar-plum fairies dancing in my head. I confess I suspected that before long I would be (as above) leading the internet conversation. A moment of clear-headed consideration would have set me straight on that dubious proposition soon enough. I have always been something of a weirdo -- something of an acquired taste that not all that many people have ever bothered to acquire.
The older you get, the more you realize things like that happen for a reason, and this morning I'm reminded again of that truth. This blog is not some well-kept secret. It's not some hidden jewel. It's not small and relatively untravelled because of its ruthlessly uncompromising nature. Far, far, far, far from it.
It is what it yam and that's all that it yam, and that's the way I like it.
I have written a few posts that I am extraordinarily proud of, and I'm glad a goodly number of people have managed to find and read them. Sometimes they have been pointed to by blogs with bigger readerships. Other times strangers to this place have found them on their own, often through exceedingly poignant search phrases like "death of a friend" or "i'm gay and want to stay in the closet" or "diabetic cat pooping outside the box". Okay, that last one isn't so poignant, but I am proud to have been of some service to other diabetic cat owners.
In some limited but nevertheless important sense, this blog is me. I don't think I could cope with 256 responses to me all at once. Or -- better put -- I doubt very much that very many of those 256 responses would have anything to do with me. It is absolutely true that I am an egomaniac, as evidenced by this blog; it's just that my egomania is of the self-obsessed variety, as opposed to the needing the ego-boo that comes of hundreds of thousands of hits variety.
So. This is a happy little backwater blog. Quiet and "underpopulated" and a bit too remote for many people's tastes. That sound you hear? That's the creaking of my rocking chair out there on the old wooden porch, overlooking the pond of me.
Okay, well, I reckon it's good to like what you've got -- it's a hard trick for most humans to learn. But your piece on the Colbert phenomenon meshes very nicely with the one in Salon, so I will venture to opine that it would by no means be a bad thing if more people read you. You're right that a lot of the comments would likely as not really not be about you. I suspect that your real effect, like that of a good teacher, would mostly be invisible to you anyway. You're a good writer, and you often write things very worth reading. To the extent that your tendency to blogwhore was a recognition of your own talent and works, it's really spot on. It's just that the feedback-monkey can take over so easily, and that's not such a good thing.
Posted by: Ulrika | May 02, 2006 at 12:48 PM
That's funny, because when I read your Colbert entry, I idly wondered why this blog wasn't actually a frontwater. Not in so many words, of course, but the thought was there. Your writing is so funny, insightful and moving, it just seems like it should occupy a much more prominent position within the nets of inter. Out of all the blogs I read, your entries have made the most lasting impressions on me. For that matter, I just weeded out my rss feeds and ended up deleting a few high profile blogs because I realized how repetitive and uninteresting many of their posts were. I kept yours.
Knowing your thoughts on the subject of internet fame, I guess I'm just glad that your entries pop up on my newsreader every now and again.
So, thanks.
Posted by: Jeremy | May 02, 2006 at 12:49 PM
...I will venture to opine that it would by no means be a bad thing if more people read you.
No, I don't think it would be a bad thing, necessarily. Of course it would be great if that could happen and the thing could stay kind of a sleepy backwater. I mean, hell, what writer wouldn't want to have a bigger audience of readers? I guess all I'm saying is, since I'm not having to make my living from this thing... well, I guess that relaxes me and makes the whole thing a hell of a lot more pleasurable than I suspect it would be if I had to "support" some huge, sweeping ocean current of commenters.
You're right that a lot of the comments would likely as not really not be about you.
Heh. I realized later that I probably should have rearranged that thought a bit. At least make some effort, you know, to hide a little better the true meaning of what I was saying (which was: "It's about ME! ME!")
But I probably should have framed it in terms of people commenting on the things I write about, as opposed to me personally. I mean, obviously what I really meant was "It's about ME! ME!", but I probably should have buried that urge a little deeper. Some truths are a bit too unseemly even for my exceedingly low bar.
Posted by: Corpsy | May 02, 2006 at 02:30 PM
Your writing is so funny, insightful and moving, it just seems like it should occupy a much more prominent position within the nets of inter. Out of all the blogs I read, your entries have made the most lasting impressions on me.
Jesus. Stop, stop [squishy sound of worm being applied to hook] you'll make it seem [fx: "reeeeeeeee" of nylon line being cast] like I was [plop of lure into standing water] fishing for compliments or something.
Seriously, though, that's exactly the kind of writing I want to be doing in here so it really means a lot to me to hear that I'm succeeding in my efforts at least to some degree.
Posted by: Corpsy | May 02, 2006 at 02:36 PM
Sweetie. Of course it's all about you. But that's okay, because it's interesting and well done all about you. And usually a bit better disguised than that. :)
Posted by: Ulrika | May 03, 2006 at 12:47 PM